JOHN B. VAUGHN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1965-07-27
No. 64-980
Before HENDRY, C. J., and CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.
177 So. 2d 505 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1965) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the trial court correctly denied the motion to vacate.


Facts & Procedural History

Petitioner, represented by counsel, appealed the summary denial of his motion to vacate. The motion alleged inadequate legal representation and that t…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of a summary denial of a motion to vacate brought pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A., ch. 924 Appendix.

The more salient allegations of the motion are:

1. That petitioner did not have adequate legal representation, and
2. That the trial court did not make inquiry as to his guilty plea.

The record discloses that petitioner was represented by privately retained counsel through his arraignment. Thereafter, he was represented by the public defender’s office at all critical stages of the proceedings.

The trial judge correctly determined that the contention with regard to alleged incompetent representation was insufficient to necessitate a hearing. See Sam v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 258; Simpson v. State, Fla.App.1964, 164 So.2d 224; Wooten v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 305.

Petitioner’s remaining contention is-likewise without merit. See Conley v. State, Fla.App.1964, 160 So.2d 752.

No error appearing the order appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Bell v. State, 179 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed on the authority of Conley v. State, Fla.App.1964, 160 So. 2d 752; Thompson v. State, Fla.App.1965, 176 So. 2d 564; Vaughn v. State, Fla.App.1965, 177 So. 2d 505.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw