LENTIN, DOING BUSINESS AS J. LENTIN LUMBER CO.

v.

PORTER, PRICE ADMINISTRATOR

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Ragland, 375 F.2d 471 (2d Cir. 1967)
  …aware that an offense is to occur may be sufficient to base an inference of complicity when such presence either facilitates, Garguilo, supra at 253, or permits, e. g., United States v. Arrow Packing Corp., 153 F. 2d 669, 670 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 327 U.S. 805, 66 S.Ct. 962, 90 L.Ed. 1030 (1946) the unlawful act. An otherwise innocent act of “relatively slight moment,” Garguilo, supra at 253, may, when viewed in the context of surrounding circumstances, justify an inference of complicity, see, e. g., Unit…
• United States v. DI Donato, 301 F.2d 383 (2d Cir. 1962)
  …eyed to the jury. Although a defendant cannot complain of the court’s refusal to charge exactly as he requests, United States v. Verra, 301 F. 2d 381, 2nd Cir., 1962; United States v. Arrow Packing Corp., 153 F. 2d 669, 671 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 327 U.S. 805, 66 S.Ct. 962, 90 L. Ed. 1030 (1946), he may justifiably complain when the court refuses to charge the correct law expressly, and thereby relies upon the jury’s ability to infer it. If no objection is made there may be no error — if the inference is…
• United States v. Verra, 301 F.2d 381 (2d Cir. 1962)
  …in substantial compliance with appellant’s request, was erroneous because it was not in the exact words requested is without merit. Rule 52(a), F.R.Crim.P., 18 U.S.C.A.; United States v. Arrow Packing Corp., 153 F. 2d 669 (2 Cir. 1946) cert. denied 327 U.S. 805, 66 S. Ct. 962, 90 L.Ed. 1030 (1946). Affirmed.…