WILLIAMS

v.

OVERHOLSER, SUPERINTENDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Dowd v. United States ex rel. Cook, 340 U.S. 206 (U.S. 1951)
  …harged. See Mahler v. Eby, 264 U. S. 32, 46. It is so ordered. See Cook v. State, 219 Ind. 234, 37 N. E. 2d 63; State ex rel. Cook v. Wickens, 222 Ind. 383, 53 N. E. 2d 630. State ex rel. Cook v. Howard, 223 Ind. 694, 64 N. E. 2d 25, cert. denied 327 U. S. 808. This order is unreported. Certiorari to review the denial of the petition for delayed appeal was sought here and denied. 330 U. S. 841. The finding was that “the basic allegation of said petition to-wit : that [Cook’s] counsel refused, without pa…
• United States ex rel. Cook v. Dowd, 180 F.2d 212 (7th Cir. 1950)
  …said Fourteenth Amendment.” The petition was denied by the LaPorte Circuit Court. On appeal, the judgment was affirmed, State ex rel. Cook v. Howard, 223 Ind. 694, 64 N.E. 2d 25, and the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari. Cook v. Howard, 327 U.S. 808, 66 S.Ct. 960, 90 L.Ed. 1032. On October 4, 1946, he filed a petition in the Supreme Court of Indiana for allowa'nce of appeal from the judgment convicting him of murder. In this petition he again alleged substantially the same facts contained in…

  ← 1 / 2 →