HOWARD HALL CO., INC.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
HOWARD HALL CO., INC.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
328 U.S. 818
Supreme Court of the United States (1946)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The judgment is affirmed. Alton R. Co. v. United States, 315 U. S. 15; United States v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp., 315 U. S. 475; Howard Hall Co. v. United States, 315 U. S. 495.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Raddatz, 592 F.2d 976 (7th Cir. 1979)…(1948); Aunt Mid, Inc. v. Fjell-Oranje Lines, 458 F. 2d 712, 716 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 877, 93 S.Ct. 130, 34 L.Ed.2d 131 (1972); S. Buchsbaum & Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 153 F. 2d 85, 88 (7th Cir.), vacated on request of parties, 328 U.S. 818, 66 S.Ct. 1016, 90 L.Ed. 1600 (1946). See also Fed.R.Civ.P. 53(e)(2), requiring the district court to accept a master’s findings of fact unless clearly erroneous. Neither of these procedural devices for assessing credibility was employed in this ca…1 / 2
-
United States v. Vater, 259 F.2d 667 (2d Cir. 1958)…1, 148 A.L.R. 316. Cf. Smith v. Dental Products Co., 7 Cir., 1948, 168 F. 2d 516; S. Buchsbaum & Co. v. Federal Trade Comm., 7 Cir., 1946, 153 F. 2d 85, certiorari granted, and judgment vacated on respondent’s waiver of decision in its favor, 1946, 328 U.S. 818, 66 S.Ct. 1016, 90 L.Ed. 1600. The importance of demeanor evidence to the particular case is an important but not always determinative consideration. In any event, the present appeal does not squarely raise the constitutional issue, for appellants…
Authorities Cited
- Alton R.R. Co. v. United States, 315 U.S. 15 (U.S. 1942)
- United States v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp., 315 U.S. 475 (U.S. 1942)
- Howard Hall Co., Inc. v. United States, 315 U.S. 495 (U.S. 1942)