COGSWELL
v.
CHICAGO & EASTERN ILLINOIS RAILROAD CO.
COGSWELL
CHICAGO & EASTERN ILLINOIS RAILROAD CO.
328 U.S. 820
Supreme Court of the United States (1946)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 328 U.S. 830
Cited by 3 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The petition is granted, except as to the question whether the jury could have found respondent guilty of a violation of Rule 152 of the Interstate Commerce Commission. The judgment is reversed. Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 318 U. S. 54, 67-8; Bailey v. Central Vermont R. Co., 319 U. S. 350, 353-4; Lavender v. Kurn, 327 U. S. 645.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gulf OIL Corp. v. Gilbert, 330 U.S. 501 (U.S. 1947)
-
Jesionowski v. Boston & Me. R.R., 329 U.S. 452 (U.S. 1947)
-
Steele v. Gen. Mills, Inc., 329 U.S. 433 (U.S. 1947)
Authorities Cited
- Lavender v. Kurn, 327 U.S. 645 (U.S. 1946)
- Tiller v. Atl. Coast Line R.R. Co., 318 U.S. 54 (U.S. 1943)
- Bailey v. Cent. Vt. Ry., Inc., 319 U.S. 350 (U.S. 1943)