HILL

v.

BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Lichten v. E. Airlines, Inc., 189 F.2d 939 (2d Cir. 1951)
  …o limit that liability. Interstate Commerce Act § 20(11), 49 U.S. C.A. § 20(11). Hartzberg v. New York Cent. R. R., 181 Misc. 129, 41 N.Y.S.2d 345, affirmed 268 App.Div. 904, 51 N.Y.S.2d 741, affirmed 295 N.Y. 703, 65 N.E. 2d 337, certiorari denied 328 U.S. 849, 66 S.Ct. 1121, 90 L.Ed. 1622. The absence of a similar provision in the Civil Aeronautics Act compels the conclusion that such an exemption is not forbidden to air carriers, and that the Board could properly accept the appellee’s tariff. [*942] Th…
• Vernie Loren West v. United States, 397 F.2d 381 (7th Cir. 1968)
  …. 2) the taxpayer had a right to a determination on the merits regardless of customer consents. The issue of failure to file a proper refund claim was clearly presented in Cudahy Packing Co. v. United States, 7 Cir., 1945, 152 F. 2d 831, cert. den. 328 U.S. 849, 66 S.Ct. 1120, 90 L.Ed. 1622, 1946, in which this Court affirmed the holding of the District Court that the claim for refund was insufficient to support jurisdiction. We cannot agree with the plaintiff that this holding was somehow weakened by this…
• Foley v. Capone Elec. Co., Inc., 194 F.2d 605 (2d Cir. 1952)
  …67 F. 2d 934. Nor does the refusal to set aside the verdict because of allegedly excessive damages present any ground for reversal. Miller v. Maryland Casualty Co., 2 Cir., 40 F. 2d 463; Herzig v. Swift & Co., 2 Cir., 154 F. 2d 64, certiorari denied 328 U.S. 849, 66 S.Ct. 1122, 90 L.Ed. 1622. Whether it would be a ground for reversal if there had been an abuse of discretion we have no occasion to consider since none has been shown. Astles v. Quaker City Bus Co., 2 Cir., 158 F. 2d 979. Cf. Southern Pacific C…