DAVIS

v.

INDIANA

Citator

Cited By

• Grand Union Equip. Co., Inc v. Lippner, 167 F.2d 958 (2d Cir. 1948)
  …, 80-82. It must be conceded that, as now appears, its scope in bankruptcy is at most limited. For it is now settled that it is applicable only to final orders. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. Reisley, 2 Cir., 153 F. 2d 296, certiorari denied 328 U.S. 857, 66 S.Ct. 1349, 90 L.Ed. 1629; rule 60 (b), F.R.C.P., as amended, with Committee Note thereto in Report of June, 1946, H.R. Doc. No. 473, 80th Cong., 1st Sess., 127. And the situation as to final orders is pretty thoroughly covered by the power gran…
• In re Brendan Reilly Assocs., Inc., 372 F.2d 235 (2d Cir. 1967)
  …ay be noted also that whether or not and in what circumstances the district court can review his decision not to act is perhaps not entirely clear. For example, Indemnity Ins. Co. of No. America v. Reisley, 153 F. 2d 296 (2d Cir. 1945), cert. denied 328 U.S. 857, 66 S.Ct. 1349, 90 L.Ed. 1629 (1946), held that the referee’s denial of a petition for a reconsideration of an earlier order was appeal-able for an abuse of discretion There the referee had considered the merits. Similarly, this court has ruled that…
• Md. Tuna Corp. v. The MS Benares, 429 F.2d 307 (2d Cir. 1970)
  …avis, 371 U.S. 178, 181-182, 83 S.Ct. 227, 9 L.Ed.2d 222 (1962) ; Hoiness v. United States, 335 U.S. 297, 300-301, 69 S.Ct. 70, 93 L.Ed. 16 (1948) ; Indemnity Insurance Company of North America v. Reisley, 153 F. 2d 296, 299 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 328 U.S. 857, 66 S.Ct. 1349, 90 L.Ed. 1629 (1946). . General Admiralty Rule 2: Suits in Personam — Process in— Arrest in Same In suits in personam the mesne process shall be by a simple monition in the nature of a summons to appear and answer to the suit, or…