GENERAL TRANSPORTATION CO. ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Great N. Ry. Co., 343 U.S. 562 (U.S. 1952)
  …stion as properly before us. Compare Unemployment Compensation Commission v. Aragon, 329 U. S. 143, 155 (1946); United States v. Hancock Truck Lines, 324 U. S. 774 (1945); General Transp. Co. v. United States, 65 F. Supp. 981 (D. Mass. 1946), aff’d, 329 U. S. 668 (1946) (waiver issue not raised on appeal). "(3) The Commission may, and it shall whenever deemed by it to be necessary or desirable in the public interest, after full hearing upon complaint or upon its own initiative without complaint, establish t…
• Silva v. Lynn, 482 F.2d 1282 (1st Cir. 1973)
  …, full disclosure is both a spur to reasoned decision making and a protection against criticism unfairly sought to be made after the agency’s processes have concluded. Cf. General Transportation Co. v. United States, 65 F.Supp. 981 (D.Mass.), aff’d, 329 U.S. 668, 67 S.Ct. 75, 91 L.Ed. 590 (1946). Once the complete record is before the court, it must determine the adequacy of the EIS. The relevant legal standards are those of NEPA which specifies procedures to be used in preparing an EIS for projects subjec…
• McCAW v. Fase, 216 F.2d 700 (9th Cir. 1954)
  …. For such a tax does not “aim to control” interstate commerce. Free [*707] man v. Hewit, 1946, 329 U.S. 249, 254, 67 S.Ct. 274, 277, 91 L.Ed. 265. In Whitmore v. Bureau of Revenue, 1946, D.C.N.Mex., 64 F.Supp. 911, affirmed in Whitmore v. Ormsbee, 329 U.S. 668, 67 S.Ct. 62, 91 L.Ed. 589, a three-judge court, in dismissing an action involving the New Mexico business privilege tax which levied a tax in an amount equal to two per cent of the gross receipts upon the business of radio broadcasting, § 76-1404 N…