EX PARTE BETZ; EX PARTE DURANT; EX PARTE WILLS; EX PARTE CUTINO; EX PARTE WALCZAK; EX PARTE MCKINLEY; AND EX PARTE MURPHY

Citator

Cited By

• Ahrens v. Clark, 335 U.S. 188 (U.S. 1948)
  …an area not subject to the jurisdiction of any district court may employ to assert federal rights. Cf. Ex parte Betz; Ex parte Durant; Ex parte Wills; Ex parte Cutino; Ex parte Walczak; Ex parte McKinley; and Ex parte Murphy, all reported together. 329 U. S. 672.…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Eisentrager v. Forrestal, 174 F.2d 961 (D.C. Cir. 1949)
  …624, 4 S.Ct. 544, 28 L.Ed. 542. U.S.Const. Art. III, § 2, d. 1. U.S.Const. Art. III, § 1. Martin v. Hunter’s Lessee, 1816, 1 Wheat. 304, 4 L.Ed. 97; Story, Constitution of the United States §§ 1590-1597, 1702, 5th Ed. 1891. Ex parte Betz, 1916, 329 U.S. 672, 67 S.Ct. 39, 91 L.Ed. 593. if it were to be held that Congress failed to confer upon the inferior federal courts the full judicial power vested in those courts by the Constitution, and that the residuum not so conferred remains in the common law c…
• McMAHAN v. Johnston, 163 F.2d 783 (9th Cir. 1947)
  …L.Ed. 999; McMahan v. Hulen, 327 U.S. 770, 66 S.Ct. 955, 90 L.Ed. 1000; McMahan v. Bennett, 327 U.S. 770. 66 S.Ct. 955, 90 L.Ed. 1000: Id., 327 U.S. 815, 66 S.Ct. 675, 90 L.Ed. 1038; Id., 328 U.S. 878, 66 S.Ct. 1116, 90 L.Ed. 1646; McMahan v. Clark, 329 U.S. 672, 67 S.Ct. 39; Ex parte Mc-Mahan, 329 U.S. 681, 67 S.Ct. 181; Id., 329 U.S. 690, 67 S.Ct. 485; McMahan v. United States, 8 Cir., 145 E.2d 695; Mc-Mahan v. Hunter, 10 Cir., 150 F. 2d 498; McMahan v. United States, 8 Cir., 153 F. 2d 301; Id., 8 Cir., 1…