MARR, DOING BUSINESS AS MARR DUPLICATOR CO.,
v.
A. B. DICK CO.

U.S. | 1946-11-12
No. 504
329 U.S. 680 Supreme Court of the United States (1946) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals is vacated and the cause is remanded to that court for consideration of the question, raised by the Solicitor General in his memorandum, as amicus curiae, “whether respondent’s prosecution of the instant case may not constitute a fraud upon the courts.”

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • A. B. Dick Co. v. Marr, 197 F.2d 498 (2d Cir. 1952)
    …ices of the United States as amicus curiae on the request of either the Circuit Court of Appeals or the District Court “in the framing and trial of the issue.” In response to the Solicitor General’s memorandum the Supreme Court on November 12, 1946, 329 U.S. 680, 67 S.Ct. 188, 91 L.Ed. 599, handed down a per curimn opinion granting the petition for writ of certi-orari, vacating the judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals, and remanding the cause to this court for consideration of the question raised by the…
  • Aerosol Research Co. v. Scovill Mfg. Co. (A. Schrader's SON Division), 334 F.2d 751 (7th Cir. 1964)
    …or not the S-63 valve infringes the patent. Cf. Union Oil Co. of California v. American Bitumuls Co., 9 Cir., 109 F. 2d 140, 147; A. B. Dick Co. v. Marr, (D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1942) 48 F.Supp. 775, 778, aff’d 2 Cir., 155 F. 2d 923, vacated on other grounds, 329 U.S. 680, 67 S.Ct. 188, 91 L.Ed. 599. On remand of this case the District Court may either receive evidence and determine the issue as to whether the S-63 valve infringes or direct the master so to do. The spray tips manufactured and sold by plaintiff are n…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw