MARTINI ET AL., DOING BUSINESS AS LAKESIDE CUT-RATE LIQUOR STORE,

v.

PORTER, PRICE ADMINISTRATOR

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Gonzales v. United States, 348 U.S. 407 (U.S. 1955)
  …es to us, the board made use of evidence of which [the registrant] may have been unaware, and which he had no chance to answer: a prime requirement of any fair hearing.” United States v. Balogh, 157 F. 2d 939, 943, judgment vacated on other grounds, 329 U. S. 692. See also Brewer v. United States, 211 F. 2d 864 (C. A. 4th Cir. 1954). So basic, indeed, is this “prime requirement of any fair hearing” that counsel for the Government contended for the first time in oral argument that the rights of the registra…
• Sicurella v. United States, 348 U.S. 385 (U.S. 1955)
  …this position and we believe that they state the correct rule. Cf. United States ex rel. Levy v. Cain, 149 F. 2d 338, 342 (C. A. 2d Cir. 1945); United States v. Balogh, 157 F. 2d 939, 943-944 (C. A. 2d Cir. 1946), judgment vacated on other grounds, 329 U. S. 692; United States v. Everngam, 102 F. Supp. 128 (S. D. W. Va. 1951). The decision below is therefore Reversed. * In United States v. Taffs, in which we denied certiorari, 347 U. S. 928, the Government admitted as much in its petition. Its admission…
• United States v. Gearey, 368 F.2d 144 (2d Cir. 1966)
  …nt. A remand should enable the judge to ascertain from the Local'Board precisely what it meant. Compare United States v. Jakobson, supra, 325 F. 2d at 417; United States v. Balogh, 157 F. 2d 939, 944 (2 Cir. 1946), judgment vacated on other grounds, 329 U.S. 692, 67 S.Ct. 525, 91 L.Ed. 605 (1947). If it meant either that Gearey never was “a genuine c. o.” or that whatever his beliefs were on the subject, they had matured before the induction notice was sent, and if the judge is convinced of the rationalit…