RUTHERFORD FOOD CORP. ET AL.

v.

WALLING, WAGE & HOUR ADMINISTRATOR

Citator

Cited By

• Walling v. Gen. Indus. Co., 330 U.S. 545 (U.S. 1947)
  …es. The District Court heard the witnesses, and was the proper judge of their credibility.9 Affirmed. 52 Stat. 1060, 29 U. S. C. § 201 et seq. Walling v. General Industries Co., 60 F. Supp. 549. Walling v. General Industries Co., 155 F. 2d 711. 329 U. S. 704. Respondent was entitled to make this contention here without filing a cross-petition for certiorari. Langnes v. Green, 282 U. S. 531, 538; Public Service Commission of Puerto Rico v. Havemeyer, 296 U. S. 506, 509. 29 C. F. R. Cum. Supp. § 541.1,…
• Eastport S.S. Corp. v. The United States, 372 F.2d 1002 (Ct. Cl. 1967)
  …officer for disability retired pay (Lemly v. United States, 75 F.Supp. 248, 109 Ct.Cl. 760 (1948)); an action for back pay occasioned by a wrongful dismissal from the civil service (Elchibegoff v. United States, 106 Ct.Cl. 541 (1946), cert. granted, 329 U.S. 704, 67 S.Ct. 187, 91 L.Ed. 613 (1946), cert. dismissed, 329 U.S. 694, 67 S.Ct. 629, 91 L.Ed. 607 (1947)); or a claim for compensation for flood damage authorized by statute (United States v. Gerlach Live Stock Co., 339 U.S. 725, 70 S.Ct. 955, 94 L.Ed.…
• Caldarola v. Eckert, 332 U.S. 155 (U.S. 1947)
  …id not make them responsible to a third person for its condition. 295 N. Y. 463, 68 N. E. 2d 444. Because of claimed conflict in the decisions, particularly between this ruling and Hust v. Moore-McCormack Lines, 328 U. S. 707, we granted certiorari. 329 U. S. 704. No doubt petitioner could have sued the United States in Admiralty. Section 2 of the Suits in Admiralty Act, 41 Stat. 525, 46 U. S. C. § 742. He chose not to do so. Presumably to obtain the benefit of trial by jury, he asked for relief from New…