SEVEN UP CO.

v.

CHEER UP SALES CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Seven-Up Co. v. O-So-Grape Co., 283 F.2d 103 (7th Cir. 1960)
  …the awarding of costs is within the discretion of the trial court. We do not find any abuse of that discretion. Judgment affirmed. . Seven Up Co. v. Cheer Up Sales Co., 148 E.2d 909. . 326 U.S. 727, 66 S.Ct. 32, 90 L.Ed. 431. . 153 E.2d 231. . 329 U.S. 717, 67 S.Ct. 47, 91 L.Ed. 622.…
• McCOMB v. Goldblatt Bros., Inc., 166 F.2d 387 (7th Cir. 1948)
  …tled to hide a point in an obscure pleading and present it for the first time on review, but should fully and fairly acquaint the trial court with all matters relied upon.” See also Chatz v. Midco Oil Corp., 7 Cir., 152 F. 2d 153, certiorari denied, 329 U.S. 717, 67 S.Ct. 49, and Bergeron v. Mansour, 1 Cir., 152 F. 2d 27 (CCA1). Had the plaintiff objected to the procedure followed in the District Court, that court would have had opportunity to require, instead of affidavits, testimony in open court. Plain…
• Palmer A. Peterson v. Faye V. Peterson, 400 F.2d 336 (8th Cir. 1968)
  …lant points out, that a mere failure voluntarily to disclose information may not equate with concealment of property within the meaning of § 3(a) (1). Continental Bank & Trust Co. of New York v. Winter, 153 F. 2d 397, 399 (2 Cir. 1946), cert, denied 329 U.S. 717, 67 S.Ct. 49, 91 L.Ed. 622; In re Shoesmith, 135 F. 684, 687 (7 Cir. 1905), appeal dismissed 198 U.S. 582, 25 S.Ct. 804, 49 L. Ed. 1172. And too general averments, or those which merely employ the language of the statute, have been held to be insuff…