THIRD NATIONAL BANK

v.

FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN INSURANCE CORP.; AND THIRD NATIONAL BANK V. FEDERAL DEPOSIT CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Ford Motor Co. v. Busam Motor Sales, Inc., 185 F.2d 531 (6th Cir. 1950)
  …t in the absence of a judgment, an appeal will not lie, even though a ruling has been given in the court’s opinion. Cashion v. Bunn, 9 Cir., 149 F. 2d 969; United States v. San Geronimo Development Co., 1 Cir., 154 F. 2d 78, 83-84, certiorari denied 329 U.S. 718, 67 S.Ct. 50, 91 L.Ed. 623; Lockwood v. Hercules Powder Co., 8 Cir., 172 F. 2d 775. The application of the rule is also seen in the following situations: It is settled law that an appeal does not lie from an order granting a new trial. Barbarino v…
• Sutcliffe Storage & Warehouse Co., Inc. v. United States, 162 F.2d 849 (1st Cir. 1947)
  …1 in this court, there is nothing from which an appeal can be taken and we have no jurisdiction to consider it: United States v. San Geronimo Development Co., 1 Cir., 154 F. 2d 78, 84, certiorari denied San Geronimo Development Co. v. United States, 329 U.S. 718, 67 S.Ct. 50. The plaintiff asks us, in the event of our affirmance of dismis [*853] sal in the other three cases, to order dismissal also of this action to avoid what, it terms its anomalous position in having one indivisible cause of action for a…
• Camalier & Buckley-Madison, Inc. v. The Madison Hotel, Inc., 513 F.2d 407 (D.C. Cir. 1975)
  …e 1, supra. . See note 1, supra. . See note 1, supra. . See Part II, supra. Of course, we intimate no view in this regard. . See cases cited supra note 32. . See United States v. San Geronimo Dev. Co., 154 F. 2d 78, 86 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 329 U.S. 718, 67 S.Ct. 50, 91 L.Ed. 623 (1946); Hyde v. Bains, 247 Ala. 8, 22 So. 2d 324, 325 (1945); Keller v. Model Coal Co., 142 W.Va. 597, 97 S.E. 2d 337, 340 (1957). . See cases cited supra note 43. . See Gibson v. Lee Wilson & Co., 211 Ark. 300, 200 S.W.…