PHILADELPHIA COMPANY
v.
GUGGENHEIM ET AL.; PHILADELPHIA COMPANY V. PITTSBURGH; PHILADELPHIA COMPANY V. BAKER ET AL.; MONONGAHELA STREET RAILWAY CO. ET AL. V. GUGGENHEIM ET AL.; MONONGAHELA STREET RAILWAY CO. ET AL. V. PITTSBURGH; AND MONONGAHELA STREET RAILWAY CO. ET AL. V. BAKER ET AL.
PHILADELPHIA COMPANY
GUGGENHEIM ET AL.; PHILADELPHIA COMPANY V. PITTSBURGH; PHILADELPHIA COMPANY V. BAKER ET AL.; MONONGAHELA STREET RAILWAY CO. ET AL. V. GUGGENHEIM ET AL.; MONONGAHELA STREET RAILWAY CO. ET AL. V. PITTSBURGH; AND MONONGAHELA STREET RAILWAY CO. ET AL. V. BAKER ET AL.
329 U.S. 731
Supreme Court of the United States (1946)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Chem. Bank NEW York Tr. Co. for Bondholders v. Kheel, 369 F.2d 845 (2d Cir. 1966)…nied 323 U.S. 778, 65 S.Ct. 191, 89 L.Ed. 622 (1945), the inclusion of underlying utility segments separately owned in a single reorganization, In re Pittsburgh Rys. Co., 155 F. 2d 477 (3d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Philadelphia Co. v. Guggenheim, 329 U.S. 731, 67 S.Ct. 89, 91 L.Ed. 632 (1946), the determination of whether shareholders are entitled to participate prior to the preparation of a plan. In re Third Avenue Transit Corp., 238 F. 2d 665 (2d Cir. 1956), cert. denied, Woolfson v. Doyle, 352 U.S. 10…
-
Philadelphia Co. v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n (city of Pittsburgh, 175 F.2d 808 (D.C. Cir. 1948)…estion of that court’s jurisdiction with respect to Pittsburgh’s underlier companies. This culminated in a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (In re Pittsburgh Rys. Co., 1946, 155 F. 2d 477, certiorari denied, 1946, 329 U.S. 731, 67 S.Ct. 89, 90, 91 L.Ed. 632) holding that the District Court had jurisdiction over the Pittsburgh transportation system as a unit, including the underliers, notwithstanding that some of them were not subsidiaries of any registered holding company…
-
In re Imperial "400" Nat'l, Inc., 429 F.2d 671 (3d Cir. 1970)…ave been interpreted broadly. See e. g. In re International Power Securities Corporation, 170 F. 2d 399 (3d Cir. 1948); In re Pittsburgh Rys. Co., 155 F. 2d 477, 483-485 and n. 15 (3d Cir. 1946) cert. denied, sub nom. Philadelphia Co. v. Guggenheim, 329 U.S. 731, 67 S.Ct. 89, 91 L.Ed. 632. Cf. New Haven Inclusion cases, 399 U.S. 392, 90 S.Ct. 2054, 26 L.Ed.2d 691 (1970). This Court’s decision in International Power Securities explained the broad injunctive powers inherent in the reorganization court by virt…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence