THOMPSON

v.

ILLINOIS

Citator

Cited By

• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Swift & Co., 292 F.2d 561 (1st Cir. 1961)
  …ence as a whole and the deference which is to be accorded Board determinations of appropriate units, we find ample support for the Board’s decision. Compare N. L. R. B. v. Armour & Co., 10 Cir., 1946, 154 F. 2d 570, 169 A.L.R. 421, certiorari denied 329 U.S. 732, 67 S.Ct. 92, 91 L.Ed. 633; N. L. R. B. v. Swift & Co., 3 Cir., 1947, 162 F. 2d 575, certiorari denied 332 U.S. 791, 68 S.Ct. 101, 92 L.Ed. 373; N. L. R. B. v. Swift & Co., 9 Cir., 1957, 240 F. 2d 65. As to the contention that the Board should not…
• Foreman & Clark, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 215 F.2d 396 (9th Cir. 1954)
  …individual employees listed in the Union’s proposed group should be included therein. To borrow the language of the Court in National Labor Relations Board v. Armour & Co., 10 Cir., 1946, 154 F. 2d 570, 573, 169 A.L.R. 421, certiorari denied, 1946, 329 U.S. 732, 67 S.Ct. 92, 91 L.Ed. 633, the tailor shop employees “are a cohesive group, allied as to their bargaining interests by the similarity of their functions and working conditions.” 6. The Board’s Unit Determination Was Not Controlled By The Extent To…
• Commissioner OF Internal Revenue v. Killian, 314 F.2d 852 (5th Cir. 1963)
  …ty sold had one single practical and legal attribute: good will. It is settled that good will, as a distinct property right, is a capital asset under the tax laws. See Ensley Bank & Trust Co. v. United States, 154 F. 2d 968 (CA 5, 1946), cert. den. 329 U.S. 732, 67 S.Ct. 94, 91 L.Ed. 633; V. L. Phillips & Co., Inc. et al. v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers’ Mut. Cas. Ins. Co., 199 F. 2d 244 (CA 4, 1952); George J. Aitken et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 35 T.C. 227 (1960). The informational…