BOLLINGER ET VIR

v.

GOTHAM GARAGE CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Anderson v. United States, 417 U.S. 211 (U.S. 1974)
  …ose used in other § 241 prosecutions. See United States v. Saylor, 322 U. S. 385 (1944); United States v. Kantor, 78 F. 2d 710 (CA2 1935); Walker v. United States, 93 F. 2d 383 (CA8 1937); Ledford v. United States, 155 F. 2d 574 (CA6), cert. denied, 329 U. S. 733 (1946).…
• United States v. Daughtry, 502 F.2d 1019 (5th Cir. 1974)
  …ttached to them as evi-dentiary of the guilt of the accused precinct election officials. The ballots were admissible tó carry only such weight as the jury chose to give them. Ledford v. United States, 6 Cir., 1946, 155 F. 2d 574, 576, cert. denied, 329 U.S. 733, 67 S.Ct. 96, 91 L.Ed. 634. . Very well, members of the jury, it looks like crime pays. That kind of verdict is beyond my understanding. It is up to you on your own verdict. You will be excused. See how easy it is to fool a jury? (Thereupon, the…
• Stafford v. Int'l Harvester Co. & Eastco Truck Sales, Inc., 668 F.2d 142 (2d Cir. 1981)
  …rowing statute to mean a cause of action where suit could have been brought, we would be heeding the often noted admonition of Judge Learned Hand in Brooklyn Nat. Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 157 F. 2d 450, 451 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 329 U.S. 733, 67 S.Ct. 96, 91 L.Ed. 634 (1946), that “there is often no surer way to misconceive the meaning of a statute or any other writing than to construe it verbally. ... ” Insofar as the purpose of the borrowing statute is not to protect its residents fro…