HONEYMAN, EXECUTRIX, ET AL.

v.

HUGHES, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY

Citator

Cited By

• United States ex rel. Jacob Wissenfeld v. Wilkins, 281 F.2d 707 (2d Cir. 1960)
  …or factual inferences to be drawn from the testimony, an appellate court with only “cold print” before it is ill placed to reject the district court’s evaluation. Albert ex rel. Buice v. Patterson, 1 Cir., 155 F. 2d 429, 432, certiorari denied 1946, 329 U.S. 739, 67 S.Ct. 83, 91 L.Ed. 638; see Morris Plan Industrial Bank v. Henderson, 2 Cir., 1942, 131 F. 2d 975, 977. Relator argues, nonetheless, that although the district court would have been entitled to reject his testimony as a fabrication were that the…
• Farrell v. Lanagan, 166 F.2d 845 (1st Cir. 1948)
  …disbelieve, or find insufficient, oral testimony, even if uncontradicted, given' with respect to a basic issue by a party having the burden of persuasion.” Albert ex rel. Buice v. Patterson, 1 Cir., 1946, 155 F. 2d 429, 432, certiorari denied, 1946, 329 U.S. 739, 67 S.Ct. 83. On the record before us, the petitioner has not shown that he has been deprived of his constitutional rights. His; plight appears to be more for executive clemency than for judicial action. The decision of the District Court is affir…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Elias v. Dulles, 211 F.2d 520 (1st Cir. 1954)
  …ous in finding that this testimony was insufficient to support plaintiff’s claim. See Quock Ting v. United States, 1891, 140 U.S. 417, 11 S.Ct. 733, 35 L.Ed. 501; Albert ex rel. Buice v. Patterson, 1 Cir., 1946,155 F. 2d 429, certiorari denied 1946, 329 U.S. 739, 67 S.Ct. 83, 91 L.Ed. 638; Zimmer v. Acheson, 10 Cir., 1951, 191 F. 2d 209. The judgment of the District Court is affirmed. . “Sec. 503. If any person who claims a right or privilege as a national of the United States is denied such right or priv…