ANTONELLI FIREWORKS CO., INC. ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (30 total)

• Darden v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 168 (U.S. 1986)
  …practice of this court —recalling the bitter tear shed by the Walrus as he ate the oysters — breeds a deplorably cynical attitude towards the judiciary” (footnote omitted). United States v. Antonelli Fireworks Co., 155 F. 2d 631, 661, cert, denied, 329 U. S. 742 (1946). I believe this Court must do more than wring its hands when a State uses improper legal standards to select juries in capital cases and permits prosecutors to pervert the adversary process. I therefore dissent. See, e. g., Caldwell v. Miss…
• Wilkerson v. McCARTHY, 336 U.S. 53 (U.S. 1949)
  …Cowdrick v. Penn. R. Co, 323 U. S. 799. Negro v. Boston & Maine R., 324 U. S. 862. Fantini v. Reading Co., 325 U. S. 856. Scarborough v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 326 U. S. 755. Chisholm v. Reading Co., 329 U. S. 807. Waller v. Northern P. T. Co., 329 U. S. 742. Wolfe v. Henwood, 332 U. S. 773. Lasagna v. McCarthy, 332 U. S. 829. Trust Co. of Chicago v. Erie R. Co., 334 U. S. 845. B. Where lower court sustained a jury verdict for the employer: Barry v. Reading Co., 324 U. S. 867. Benton v. St. Louis-S.…
• United States v. Mechanik, 475 U.S. 66 (U.S. 1986)
  …lear violations of their procedural rights reduces the law to “‘pretend-rules,’” United States v. Borello, 766 F. 2d 46, 58 (CA2 1985), quoting United States v. Antonelli Fireworks Co., 155 F. 2d 631, 661 (CA2) (Frank, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 329 U. S. 742 (1946); it means that prosecutors are free to engage in prohibited conduct subject only to “purely ceremonial” words of appellate displeasure. 155 F. 2d, at 661. The Court’s rule that all grand jury misconduct becomes harmless after conviction, how…