WRIGHT

v.

LOHR, ADMINISTRATRIX

Citator

Cited By

• Reck v. Pacific-Atlantic S. S. Co., 180 F.2d 866 (2d Cir. 1950)
  …62 F. 2d 779, 785; Vanadium Corp. of America v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md., 2 Cir., 159 F. 2d 105, 109; Commercial Banking Corp. v. Martel, 2 Cir., 123 F. 2d 846; and see Wright v. Wilson, 3 Cir., 154 F. 2d 616, 170 A.L.R. 1237, certiorari denied 329 U.S. 743, 67 S.Ct. 50, 91 L.Ed. 640. We should give it rational effect in so normal an instance as this. As a matter of fact, the courts of New York, where this casé was tried, have steadily supported the use of such texts in the cross-examination of medica…
• Provident Tradesmens Bank & Tr. Co. v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. & George M. Patterson, 365 F.2d 802 (3d Cir. 1966)
  …’s incompetency is so thoroughly established in Pennsylvania that despite strong criticism it may not be supplanted by federal decisional rules in a diversity action. Wright v. Wilson, 154 F. 2d 616, 620, 170 A.L.R. 1237 (3 Cir. 1946), cert. denied, 329 U.S. 743, 67 S.Ct. 50, 91 L.Ed. 640 (1946). Cf. Hanna v. Plumer, 380 U.S. 460, 85 S.Ct. 1136, 14 L.Ed.2d 8 (1965). . See Coca-Cola Co. v. Pepsi-Cola Co., 6 W.W.Harr. 124, 36 Del. 124, 172 A. 260 (1934). . Bruszewski was cited favorably by the Pennsylvania…
• Patterson v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co., 489 F.2d 303 (6th Cir. 1973)
  …al court if it is admissible under any of three tests: (a) under a federal statute, (b) under federal equity precedents, or (c) under the rules of evidence of the state in which the court sits. Wright v. Wilson, 154 F. 2d 616 (3rd Cir.), cert. den., 329 U.S. 743, 67 S.Ct. 50, 91 L.Ed. 640 (1946). In this case, the privilege is a state-created one which, if enforced, would exclude the contested evidence.1 Under the policies of the maximum admissibility rule, some federal courts, in [*307] cases involving f…