WOOTTEN HOTEL CORP.

v.

NORTHERN ASSURANCE CO., LTD.

Citator

Cited By

• Armotek Indus., Inc. v. Emp'rs Ins. OF Wausau, 952 F.2d 756 (3d Cir. 1991)
  …is a question of law with respect to which we exercise plenary review. Matter of Resyn Corp., 945 F. 2d 1279, 1280 (3d Cir.1991). . This case is not controlled by Wootton Hotel Corp. v. Northern Assurance Co., 155 F. 2d 988 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 329 U.S. 758, 67 S.Ct. 111, 91 L.Ed. 654 (1946). In that case, applying the parol evidence rule, we deemed that an insurance policy had been countersigned in New Jersey by the insurer’s New Jersey resident agent as indicated in the policy itself, rather than in…
• Hampton v. Thompson, 171 F.2d 535 (5th Cir. 1948)
  …t, impeaching or casting doubt upon the conclusions we reached there, has been called to our attention. We have found none. That case and those of Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. New Orleans, T. & M. Ry. Co., 8 Cir., 156 F. 2d 1, certiorari denied 329 U.S. 758, 67 S.Ct. 112, 91 L.Ed. 654 and Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. v. Randolph, 8 Cir., 164 F. 2d 4, certiorari denied 334 U.S. 818, 68 S.Ct. 1082, are precise authority in support of the trial court’s action, unless the fact, that the plaintiffs in this…
• The Order OF R.R. Telegraphers v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 349 F.2d 408 (10th Cir. 1965)
  …Order of Railroad Telegraphers (“Telegraphers”). For a detailed history of the origins of this dispute, see Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. New Orleans, T. & M. Ry., 61 F.Supp. 869 (E.D.Mo.), vacated and remanded 156 F. 2d 1 (8th Cir.), cert. den. 329 U.S. 758, 67 S.Ct. 112, 91 L.Ed. 654. The facts in the controversy before the Board insofar as they are pertinent here are as follows: The dispute grew out of the action of the Union Pacific in 1952 in installing electronic equipment in its various yard off…