LOGIN CORPORATION
v.
PORTER, PRICE ADMINISTRATOR
LOGIN CORPORATION
PORTER, PRICE ADMINISTRATOR
329 U.S. 771
Supreme Court of the United States (1946)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
California Apparel Creators v. Wieder OF Cal., Inc., 162 F.2d 893 (2d Cir. 1947)…Alcorn, 150 U.S. 460, 464, 14 S.Ct. 151, 37 L.Ed. 1144; Canal Co. v. Clark, 80 U.S. 311, 13 Wall. 311, 20 L.Ed. 581; LaTouraine Coffee Co. v. Lorraine Coffee Co., 2 Cir., 157 F. 2d 115, certiorari denied Lorraine Coffee Co. v. LaTouraine Coffee Co., 329 U.S. 771, 67 S.Ct. 189.5 But, as plaintiffs contend, a geographical name may acquire a secondary significance which will support an action for unfair competition. Our case concerns that question; we have to see whether or not plaintiffs have such rights in t…
-
David Sherman Corp. v. Heublein, Inc., 340 F.2d 377 (8th Cir. 1965)…as well as appearance, of the words or letters may constitute infringement”. Esso, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co., supra, p. 5 of 98 F. 2d. To the same effect are LaTouraine Coffee Co. v. Lorraine Coffee Co., 157 F. 2d 115, 117 (2 Cir.1946), cert. denied 329 U.S. 771, 67 S.Ct. 189, 91 L.Ed. 663; Abramson v. Coro, Inc., 240 F. 2d 854, 857 (5 Cir.1957); and Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Lincoln Laboratories, 322 F. 2d 968, 971 (7 Cir.1963). 7. Some dissimilarity in form and color is not conclusive against infringement.…