CARTNER

v.

NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By

• United States ex rel. Berman v. Craig, 207 F.2d 888 (3d Cir. 1953)
  …which the registrant had no control.” . Compare In re Abramson, 1952, 3 Cir., 196 F. 2d 261. . See Chih Chung Tung v. United States, 1944, 1 Cir., 142 F. 2d 919. See also Smith v. United States, 1946, 4 Cir., 157 F. 2d 176, 183, certiorari denied 329 U.S. 776, 67 S.Ct. 189, 91 L.Ed. 666. . Davis v. United States, 1952, 6 Cir., 199 F. 2d 689; Knox v. United States, 1952, 9 Cir., 200 F. 2d 398. . United States v. Stiles, 1948, 3 Cir., 169 F. 2d 455. . 32 CFR (Revised, 1951) § 1624.24(b). . 32 CFR (Revi…
• Campbell v. United States, 221 F.2d 454 (4th Cir. 1955)
  …rd did and held the letters insufficient to warrant a change. This was a matter within the discretion of the board and there is nothing to indicate that the discretion was abused. Smith v. United States, 4 Cir., 157 F. 2d 176, 181, certiorari denied 329 U.S. 776, 67 S.Ct. 189, 91 L.Ed. 666, rehearing denied 329 U.S. 831, 67 S.Ct. 367, 91 L.Ed. 704. The District Court had no power to review the action of the draft board or to determine whether or not the appellant was a conscientious objector. This was a ma…
• United States v. Mohammed, 288 F.2d 236 (7th Cir. 1961)
  …ists for the classification given. Estep v. U. S., supra. The court properly excluded the evidence which was relevant only to the merits of defendant’s claim of ministerial status. See Smith v. United States, 4 Cir., 157 F. 2d 176, certiorari denied 329 U.S. 776, 67 S.Ct. 189, 91 L.Ed. 666, in which the conviction of a registrant who claimed ministerial status was reversed on the ground, inter alia, that the trial judge had permitted the issue of the defendant’s status as a minister to be tried before the j…

  ← 1 / 2 →