SANDERS, DOING BUSINESS AS LEO SANDERS FUEL CO.,

v.

OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION

Citator

Cited By

• In re Chicago v. Brown, 168 F.2d 587 (7th Cir. 1948)
  …, 55 S.Ct. 595, 79 L.Ed. 1110. During the ensuing thirteen years many and varied controversies have arisen and been dis [*590] posed of as shown by reported decisions in 257 I.C.C. 307; Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Fleming, 7 Cir., 157 F. 2d 241; 329 U.S. 780, 67 S.Ct. 201, 91 L.Ed. 669; In re Chicago R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 8 Cir., 160 F. 2d 942; In re Chicago R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 7 Cir., 162 F. 2d 257; Chase National Bank of the City of N. Y. v. Cheston, 332 U.S. 793, 68 S.Ct. 21; Chase National Bank of the…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Chase Nat'l Bank v. Cheston, 332 U.S. 793 (U.S. 1947)
  …mmission approved the plan of reorganization involved in this proceeding. On June 15, 1945, the District Court also approved the plan. That action in turn was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals, 157 F. 2d 241, and this Court denied certiorari. 329 U. S. 780, 811. While the proceeding was pending in the Circuit Court of Appeals, however, the District Court directed the Commission to submit the plan for acceptance or rejection to eleven classes of creditors. On February 26, 1946, the Commission certifie…