DANA ET AL.

v.

DUNCAN, TRUSTEE, ET AL.; AND EQUITABLE OFFICE BUILDING 1913 CO., INC. V. DUNCAN, TRUSTEE, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Roupp v. Woods, 177 F.2d 149 (Emer. Ct. App. 1949)
  …dings were mailed to the protestant * * * on the dates which appear on the copies of the notices * * We must accept this finding if there is substantial evidence to support it. Ebling Brewing Co. v. Porter, Em.App., 156 F. 2d 1012, certiorari denied 329 U.S. 784, 67 S.Ct. 297, 91 L.Ed. 672; Sirianni v. Bowles, Em.App., 148 F. 2d 343. But complainant argues that the finding was unjustified because, (1), it was arrived at by basing an inference upon an inference, and, (2), it is apparent from the notices them…
• Allied Oil Corp. v. Turney, 170 F.2d 79 (Emer. Ct. App. 1948)
  …80 per gallon, the regulation re- Diesel Index Rat. Cetane Rat. 58.6 53 Minimum 45 quired it, in continuing to sell fuel of the same quality, to sell at the same price. Ebling Brewing Co. Inc. v. Porter, Em.App., 156 F. 2d 1012, certiorari denied 329 U.S. 784, 67 S.Ct. 297, 91 L.Ed. 672. Under these circumstances, we can find no justification for a conclusion that the Administrator acted arbitrarily or capriciously in comparing complainant’s diesel fuel with that of other Central Illinois refiners in det…