WILSON & CO., INC. ET AL.

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

Citator

Cited By

• Caruso v. State, 645 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 1994)
  …ss-examiner must “take” the answer, is bound by it, and may not subsequently impeach the witness by introducing extrinsic evidence to contradict the witness on that point. E.g. Patterson v. State, 157 Fla. 304, 313, 25 So. 2d 713, 717, cert. denied, 329 U.S. 789, 67 S.Ct. 352, 91 L.Ed. 676 (1946); Stewart v. State, 42 Fla. 591, 594, 28 So. 815, 816 (1900); Gelabert v. State, 407 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); see generally Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 608.1 (1993 ed.). Even if there is some rel…
• Carlyle Francis Dempsey v. Shell OIL Co., 589 So. 2d 373 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)
  …s bound by the witness’s answer; it is inappropriate to then try the truth or falsity of the answer on the. collateral matter by adducing independent proof through other witnesses. Patterson v. State, 157 Fla. 304, 25 So. 2d 713 (Fla.) cert. denied, 329 U.S. 789, 67 S.Ct. 352, 91 L.Ed. 676 (1946); O’Steen v. State, 506 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); McCormick on Evidence § 47 (3d ed. 1984). See also Hernandez v. State, 575 So. 2d 1321 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Gelabert v. State, 407 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 5th DCA 1…
• Ebert v. State, 140 So. 2d 63 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)
  …ionary statement was free and voluntary is whether or not the accused was informed that he need not answer questions but that any statement he might make could be used against him. Patterson v. State, 1946, 157 Fla. 304, 25 So. 2d 713, cert. denied, 329 U. S. 789, 67 S.Ct. 352, 91 L.Ed. 676; Stouta-mire v. State, supra. There is testimony in the instant case that the accused was so warned. Both the deputy and the minister stated that the accused was crying and disturbed because of his predicament. A confess…