RICHARDSON ET AL.

v.

KELLY, RECEIVER

Citator

Cited By

• Dickinson v. Burnham, 197 F.2d 973 (2d Cir. 1952)
  …uestion Class Suit under the Federal Rules and in Illinois, 42 Ill.L.Rev. 518, 1947; Note, Federal Class Actions: A Suggested Revision of Rule 23, 46 Col.L.Rev. 818, 1946; and see Richardson v. Kelly, 144 Tex. 497, 191 S.W. 2d 857, certiorari denied 329 U.S. 798, 67 S.Ct. 487, 91 L.Ed. 683. The well-known statement of Chief Justice Stone in Hansberry v. Lee, 311 U.S. 32, 40, 41, 42, 61 S.Ct. 115, 85 L.Ed. 22, supports the constitutional sufficiency of a judgment based on notice.…
• Vaughan Novelty MFG. Co. v. G. G. Greene MFG. Corp., 202 F.2d 172 (3d Cir. 1953)
  …vely avoid this likelihood of deception can render the imitation of such a feature privileged.” Restatement, Torts, § 741, comment j (1938). . Smith, Kline & French Laboratories v. Clark & Clark, 3 Cir., 157 F. 2d 725, 731, certiorari denied, 1946, 329 U.S. 798, 67 S.Ct. 482, 91 L.Ed. 681; J. C. Penney Co. v. H. D. Lee Mercantile Co., 8 Cir., 1941, 120 F. 2d 949. . See note 11, supra.…