HAROLD H. WALMSLEY, APPELLANT,

v.

BEN WEITZNER AND EASTERN ELEVATOR COMPANY, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Blunt v. State, 203 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967)
  …ant seeking similar relief, and that under Rule One the Court was not required to entertain a second or successive motion. The denial of the earlier motion under the rule by the appellant was affirmed by this Court by memorandum decision reported in 177 So. 2d 902. Appellant was tried and convicted in a trial before a jury at which time he was represented by an attorney of his own choice. No direct appeal was taken from the judgment of conviction and sentence. In 1965, Blunt filed his first Rule One motion w…
• Mann v. Louie L. Wainwright, 191 So. 2d 867 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966)
  …e appellant. That question was submitted to us by appellant in an appeal from the denial of his Criminal Procedure Rule 1 motion, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. We affirmed the lower court’s denial of appellant’s Rule 1 motion in Mann v. State, Fla. App., 177 So. 2d 902. The other ground raised by appellant in his petition for writ of habeas corpus concerns the systematic exclusion of Negroes from the jury panel. This point was not asserted by appellant at any time during his trial at which he was found guilty and…
• Walmsley v. Weitzner, 183 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 1965)
  …Certiorari dismissed without opinion. 177 So. 2d 902.…