ILLINOIS
v.
INDIANA ET AL.

U.S. | 1947-02-17
Nos. 9, original
330 U.S. 799 Supreme Court of the United States (1947) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Illinois sought relief against Indiana and other defendants regarding water rights and related disputes, and the Supreme Court approved the Special Master's interim report and procedural recommendations for continuing the case, including the proposed apportionment of costs among the parties.

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

The Interim Report of the Special Master, dated September 7, 1946, is approved. The Court finds that the course of procedure set forth in the Interim Report, which the Special Master has followed of entering orders staying further proceedings as to particular defendants upon stipulations received in evidence which in the opinion of the Special Master justify such course, is within the discretion of the Special Master. The Court further finds that the steps set forth in the recommendations of the Special Master in the Interim Report numbered one, two, three, four, five, six, and seven as to procedure for the future disposition of the case, are within the discretion of the Special Master and are approved as appropriate under the special circumstances of this case. The Court therefore orders and directs the Special Master to continue the proceedings in accordance with said recommendations. The Court further orders that the recommendation of the Special Master as to the apportionment of costs be adopted and costs to this date shall be taxed as recommended in the Interim Report. The objections of the Fruit Growers Express Company to the proposed apportionment of costs are overruled.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Illinois v. Indiana, 340 U.S. 869 (U.S. 1950)
    …at the Amended Bill of Complaint has been dismissed as to all parties defendant who have heretofore stipulated herein to perform certain work as follows: Shell Oil Company, Incorporated, and The Texas Company dismissed by order of February 17, 1947 (330 U. S. 799); American Bridge Company, Carbide and Carbon Chemicals Corporation, E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Fruit Growers Express Company, and Universal Atlas Cement Company dismissed by order of November 17, 1947 (332 U. S. 822); Bates Expanded Stee…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw