FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION ET AL.
v.
ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT CO.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Supreme Court reversed Arkansas Power & Light Co.'s challenge to a Federal Power Commission decision, holding that the company had failed to exhaust its administrative remedies before seeking judicial review. The decision established that parties must complete all available administrative proceedings before a court will consider their claims.
© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Per Curiam:
Judgment reversed on the ground that respondent has failed to exhaust its administrative remedies. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp., 303 U. S. 41; Macauley v. Waterman S. S. Corp., 327 U. S. 540.
Howard E. Wahrenbrock argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Washington, Robert L. Stern, Lambert McAllister and Louis W. McKernan. A. J. G. Priest argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were P. A. Lasley, Sidman I. Barber and B. H. Dewey, Jr. By special leave of Court, Wyatt Cleveland Holland, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for the State of Arkansas. With him on the brief were Guy E. Williams, Attorney General, H. Cecil Kilpatrick, and the Attorneys General of the States of Alabama, Connecticut, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming, as amici curiae.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
S. Solvents, Inc. v. Canal Ins., 81 F. Supp. 298 (M.D. Fla. 1995)
Authorities Cited
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp., 303 U.S. 41 (U.S. 1938)
- MacAuley v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 327 U.S. 540 (U.S. 1946)