EX PARTE COOK; AND EX PARTE ELLIOTT

Citator

Cited By

• Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Motion Picture Advertising Serv. Co., Inc., 344 U.S. 392 (U.S. 1953)
  …substantial share of the market permanently by means of vertical integration. United States v. Pullman Co., 50 F. Supp. 123, in which many other factors were present and the share of the market considerable, was affirmed by an equally divided Court. 330 U. S. 806. The strongest finding of the Commission, par. 11, Findings as to the Facts, 47 F. T. C., at 387, states that these contracts have been “of material assistance in permitting the respondent to hold for its own use the screens of the theaters with wh…
• The Kan. City Star Co. v. United States, 240 F.2d 643 (8th Cir. 1957)
  …cter, in order to illustrate or establish his intent or motive in the particular act directly in judgment”. Wood v. United States, 16 Pet. 342, 358, 10 L.Ed. 987. In United States v. Pullman Co., D.C.E.D.Pa.1943, 50 F.Supp. 123 at page 126, affirmed 330 U.S. 806, 67 S.Ct. 1078, 91 L.Ed. 1263, an anti-trust case, the court, in commenting on evidence prior to the indictment period, stated: “We think they are competent evidence to show defendants’ state of mind at the time. The time, of course, was a good whi…
• Hiland Dairy, Inc. v. The Kroger Co., 402 F.2d 968 (8th Cir. 1968)
  …ompetitor; United States v. Swift & Company, 286 U.S. 106, 52 S.Ct. 460, 76 L.Ed. 999 (1932), divisions of territories, control of market journals and stockyard facilities; United States v. Pullman Co., 50 F.Supp. 123 (E.D.Pa.1943), aff’d per curiam 330 U.S. 806, 67 S.Ct. 1078, 91 L.Ed. 1263, exclusive dealing, refusal of service except in Pullman-owned cars, control of manufacture of sleeping cars, long-term contracts. These and many other cases dealing with conspiracies, monopolistic control of the market…

  ← 1 / 2 →