SMITH
v.
JEFFERSON COUNTY ET AL.

U.S. | 1947-03-31
No. 1096
330 U.S. 808 Supreme Court of the United States (1947) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. § 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C. § 344 (a). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code as amended, 28 U. S. C. § 344 (c), certiorari is denied.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Jule Bell v. Speed Queen, 407 F.2d 1022 (7th Cir. 1969)
    …ive agency contracts which contained no date or method of termination were terminable at will, or unenforceable for lack of mutuality. See Grand Lodge Hall Association v. Moore, 224 Ind. 575, 70 N.E. 2d 19, 22, 173 A.L.R. 6 (1945), aff’d per curiam, 330 U.S. 808, 67 S.Ct. 1088, 91 L.Ed. 1265 (1947); Uniform Commercial Code § 2-309(2). Annot., Distributorship Contract — Termination, 19 A.L.R.3d 196 (1968). The court has examined the cases cited by plaintiff and found them to be inapplicable. At most, they s…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw