LOTTO ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Tektronix, Inc. v. The United States, 552 F.2d 343 (Ct. Cl. 1977)
  …nation that presumably would be present if the interest rate allowed depended upon the state of proof or the legal rate in the plaintiff’s locality. Arkansas Valley Ry. v. United States, 107 Ct.Cl. 240, 259, 68 F.Supp. 727, 730 (1946), cert. denied, 330 U.S. 811, 67 S.Ct. 1083, 91 L.Ed. 1266 (1947). Thereafter, in a case citing Arkansas Valley Ry., the court rejected proposed variations in the rate of just compensation interest used in a large number of previous taking cases, noting the lack of a controll…
• Miller v. The United States, 620 F.2d 812 (Ct. Cl. 1980)
  …cy in favor of the establishment of a uniform rate of interest applicable to condemnation cases in order to avoid discrimination among litigants. Arkansas Valley Ry. v. United States, 107 Ct.Cl. 240, 259, 68 F.Supp. 727, 730 (1946), cert. dismissed, 330 U.S. 811, 67 S.Ct. 1083, 91 L.Ed. 1266 (1947); accord, .Carlstrom v. United States, 147 Ct.Cl. 297, 306, 177 F.Supp. 245, 250 (1959). The goal of uniformity would not be served by distinguishing between redwood park condemnees and other eondemnees.24 The […
• Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. The United States, 640 F.2d 328 (Ct. Cl. 1980)
  …mong litigants, we are required to place great weight on the strong judicial policy requiring uniformity of treatment of condemnees. Id. See also Arkansas Valley Ry. v. United States, 107 Ct.Cl. 240, 259, 68 F.Supp. 727, 730 (1946), cert. dismissed, 330 U.S. 811, 67 S.Ct. 1083, 91 L.Ed. 1266 (1947); Carlstrom v. United States, 147 Ct.Cl. 297, 306, 177 F.Supp. 245, 250 (1959). Before the court, plaintiff argues for an interest rate finding similar to that awarded in Miller. In Miller we acknowledged that un…