JOSEPH SANLEY
v.
THE ARMTON CORPORATION, A CORPORATION

Fla. | 1936-03-30
Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.
123 Fla. 524 Florida Supreme Court (1936) Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 167 So. 7
Cited by 28 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's dismissal of a suit for specific performance, finding the bill of complaint lacked equity. The court noted the defendant's unclear title and the complainant's failure to allege consideration or possession.


Holding

No, such a bill of complaint lacks equity and is subject to dismissal. The complainant must allege sufficient facts to demonstrate a right to equitable intervention.


Key Quotes

“even if there be a binding contract to convey definitely described land, it appears by the bill of complaint that the defendant has not a clear and unincumbered title to the land”

Establishes a key factual deficiency regarding the defendant's title, undermining the claim for specific performance.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The complainant filed suit for specific performance of a contract to convey land. The bill of complaint alleged the defendant did not have clear title…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

In this suit for specific performance, even if there be a binding contract to convey definitely described land, it appears by the bill of complaint that the defendant has not a clear and unincumbered title to the land, and that complainant demands “a good and sufficient deed of conveyance for the land,” or, as an alternative, that complainant, be decreed a first lien on the land for expenditures made in grubbing and clearing weeds and other debris from the land, though it is not alleged he had been given possession of the-land or permission to clear it, and it is not alleged that complainant paid any consideration whatever for the contract or the land, therefore the decree dismissing the bill of complaint upon motion for lack of equity is affirmed.

*525Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (14 total)

  • Forrest H. AKE and Mittie AKE v. Birnbaum, 156 Fla. 735 (Fla. 1945)
    …2 So. 612, construing said statute, was referred to, but were not considered by the majority opinion of Mr. Justice DAVIS to be directly in point and were not overruled. And in International Shoe Co. et al. v. Hewitt as administrator, 123 Fla. 587, 167 So. 7, it was held that the death of the tortfeasor in "the automobile accident in which plaintiff’s decedent was killed did not preclude recovery from the tortfeasor’s administratrix. This case was [*759] brought under the wrongful death statute. The cas…
  • Mallory v. O'Neil, 69 So. 2d 313 (Fla. 1954)
    …octrine the negligence of the employer is immaterial since this Court is committed to the rule that if the employee is not liable the employer is not liable. Williams v. Hines, 80 Fla. 690, 86 So. 695; International Shoe Co. v. Hewitt, 123 Fla. 587, 167 So. 7. The allegations of the complaint are entirely inadequate to charge the defendant with liability under the doctrine of respondeat superior. Other jurisdictions have considered the negligence of the master in knowingly keeping a dangerous-servant on…
  • Weiss v. Jacobson, 62 So. 2d 904 (Fla. 1953)
    …sing out of the negligent acts of his employee, if such acts were done within the scope of the employee’s authority as such. They cite Orr v. Avon Florida Citrus Corporation, 130 Fla. 306, 177 So. 612; International Shoe Co. v. Hewitt, 123 Fla. 587, 167 So. 7, and rely confidently upon our opinion in Stinson v. Prevatt, 84 Fla. 416, 94 So. 656, 657. Counsel quote the following paragraph taken from the latter -case: “As a general rule under the prin- ' ciples of the common law an employer is liable in da…

Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw