WADE ET AL., DOING BUSINESS AS CADILLAC TOOL & DIE CO., ET AL.

v.

STIMSON ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Lichter v. United States, 334 U.S. 742 (U.S. 1948)
  …s instituted after the petitioners’ respective rights to a Tax Court redetermination had been forfeited. We find no reason for not reaching here the constitutionality of the Act. Cf. Aircraft & Diesel Corp. v. Hirsch, 331 U. S. 752; Wade v. Stimson, 331 U. S. 793; Macauley v. Waterman S. S. Corp., 327 U. S. 540; Yakus v. United States, 321 U. S. 414. The constitutional argument is based upon the claim that the delegation of authority contained in the Act carried with it too slight a definition of legislativ…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Farr, 383 F.2d 166 (2d Cir. 1967)
  …nsider a question. See Bay Ridge Operating Co. v. Aaron, 334 U.S. 446, 477, [*178] 68 S.Ct. 1186, 92 L.Ed. 1502 (1948); 149 Madison Ave. Corp. v. Asselta, 331 U.S. 795, 67 S.Ct. 1726, 91 L.Ed. 1822 (1947); Alaska Juneau Gold Mining Co. v. Robertson, 331 U.S. 793, 67 S.Ct. 1728, 91 L.Ed.2d 1839 (1947).14 We have learned of no case involving the effect on the rights of litigants of a federal statute, inconsistent with a Supreme Court mandate, which became law after the Supreme Court had remanded a case to th…
• Mirabal v. Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp., 537 F.2d 871 (7th Cir. 1976)
  …ht of the Portal to Portal Act, after having in one already issued an opinion and in the other denied certiorari. See 149 Madison Avenue Corp. v. Asselta, 331 U.S. 795, 67 S.Ct. 1178, 91 L.Ed. 1432 (1947); Alaska Juneau Gold Mining Co. v. Robertson, 331 U.S. 793, 67 S.Ct. 1314, 91 L.Ed. 1839 (1947).5 In the courts of appeals judgments for overtime wages which had been rendered in the trial courts prior to passage of the act were reversed on numerous occasions. E. g., McCloskey & Co. v. Eckart, 164 F. 2d 257…

Authorities Cited

• Aircraft & Diesel Equip. Corp. v. Hirsch, 331 U.S. 752 (U.S. 1947)