RABIN

v.

MICHIGAN

Citator

Cited By

• Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Farr, 383 F.2d 166 (2d Cir. 1967)
  …91, 40 L.Ed. 414 (1895),13 or when the mandate has been amended to permit the lower court to consider a question. See Bay Ridge Operating Co. v. Aaron, 334 U.S. 446, 477, [*178] 68 S.Ct. 1186, 92 L.Ed. 1502 (1948); 149 Madison Ave. Corp. v. Asselta, 331 U.S. 795, 67 S.Ct. 1726, 91 L.Ed. 1822 (1947); Alaska Juneau Gold Mining Co. v. Robertson, 331 U.S. 793, 67 S.Ct. 1728, 91 L.Ed.2d 1839 (1947).14 We have learned of no case involving the effect on the rights of litigants of a federal statute, inconsistent w…
• Hammond v. United States, 786 F.2d 8 (1st Cir. 1986)
  …urt must apply the law in force at the time of its decision, even if it is hearing the case on appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to a prior law. For a more recent and stringent application of this rule, see 149 Madison Avenue Corp. v. Asselta, 331 U.S. 795, 67 S.Ct. 1726, 91 L.Ed. 1822 (1947), modifying 331 U.S. 199, 67 S.Ct. 1178, 91 L.Ed. 1432 (1947).2 Because rights in tort do not vest until there is a final, unreviewable judgment, Congress abridged no vested rights of the plaintiff by enacting §…

  ← 1 / 2 →