WILSON ET AL.

v.

RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Binghamton Constr. Co., Inc., 347 U.S. 171 (U.S. 1954)
  …tion for writ of certiorari in No. 78, this Term. [Certiorari denied, post, p. 926.] 123 Ct. Cl. 804, 836-837, 107 F. Supp. 712, 731, relying on Albert & Harrison, Inc. v. United States, 107 Ct. Cl. 292, 308-309, 68 F. Supp. 732, 734, cert. denied, 331 U. S. 810. 346 U. S. 809. Compare 49 Stat. 1011, 40 U. S. C. §276a-2 (b), conferring a right of action on employees to recover from the contractor the amount due the employees under the minimum wage schedule. United States v. Morley Const. Co., 98 F. 2d 78…
• Gen. Elec. Co. v. Porter, 208 F.2d 805 (9th Cir. 1953)
  …detract from the relationship of the essential duties to the administrative offices and this service distinguishes cases cited by General Electric, such as Wilson v. Reconstruction Finance Corporation, 5 Cir., 1947, 158 F. 2d 564, certiorari denied 331 U.S. 810, 67 S.Ct. 1199, 91 L.Ed. 1830, and Morris v. Beaumont Mfg. Co., D.C.S.C., 1947, 84 F.Supp. 909. Moreover, the Act does not require that an employee be employed exclusively in the particular occupation. Roland Electric Company v. Walling, 1945, 326…
• Ambrose-Augusterfer Corp. v. The United States, 394 F.2d 536 (Ct. Cl. 1968)
  …accuracy of the plans and specifications. For this proposition, plaintiff sets forth the facts both in Ruff v. United States, 96 Ct.Cl. 148 (1942); and in Albert & Harrison, Inc. v. United States, 68 F.Supp. 732, 107 Ct.Cl. 292 (1946), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 810, 67 S.Ct. 1199, 91 L.Ed. 1830 (1947). In Ruff, which involved a contract for the construction of a post office building, the plaintiff’s claim included the cost of excavating a large area which the court concluded had been misrepresented on the dra…