BLACK DIAMOND LINES, INC. ET AL.

v.

PIONEER IMPORT CORP.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Kirkpatrick, 186 F.2d 393 (3d Cir. 1951)
  …s of fact unless clearly erroneous.” Todd Erie Basin Dry Docks v. The Penelopi, 2 Cir. 1945, 148 F. 2d 884, 886; Pioneer Import Corporation v. The Lafcomo, 2 Cir. 1947, 159 F. 2d 654, 656, certiorari denied Black Diamond Lines v. Pioneer Import Co., 331 U.S. 821, 67 S.Ct. 1310, 91 L.Ed. 1838; Ozanic v. United States, 2 Cir. 1948, 165 F. 2d 738, 742; Zeller Marine Corporation v. Nessa Corporation, 2 Cir. 1948, 166 F. 2d 32. The effect of Admiralty Rule 43%, therefore, is that in the ordinary case a finding o…
• Skibs A/S Dalfonn v. S/T Alabama, 373 F.2d 101 (2d Cir. 1967)
  …States, 165 F. 2d 738, 742 (2 Cir. 1948). See also In Re Petition of A C Dodge, Inc., 282 F. 2d 86, 88 (2 Cir. 1960); Pioneer Import Corporation v. The Lafcomo, 159 F. 2d 654, 656 (2 Cir.) cert. denied Black Diamond Lines v. Pioneer Import Corp., 331 U.S. 821, 67 S.Ct. 1310, 91 L.Ed. 1838 (1947); Todd Erie Basin Dry Docks, Inc. v. The Penelopi, 148 F. 2d 884, 886 (1945). This rule has particular force where, as here, the determination rests on an evaluation of oral testimony. See [*107] Wieder v. Isbra…