THOMAS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Shotwell Mfg. Co. v. United States, 371 U.S. 341 (U.S. 1963)
  …array is not timely if it is first raised after verdict. See, e. g., Hanratty v. United States, 218 F. 2d 358, 359, cert. denied, 349 U. S. 928; United States v. Klock, 210 F. 2d 217, 220; Higgins v. United States, 160 F. 2d 222, 223, cert. denied, 331 U. S. 822; United States v. Peterson, 24 F. Supp. 470. Petitioners have not advanced any reasons for overturning this settled course of decision. Rather, they argue that when public officials violate constitutional rights by actions whose illegality is not r…
• Austin v. United States, 382 F.2d 129 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
  …n and turning over in the mind of the accused concerning his existing design and purpose to kill. See, e. g., in addition to Bostic, Bullock and Frady, discussed supra, Thomas v. United States, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 314, 158 F. 2d 97 (1946), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 822, 67 S.Ct. 1303, 91 L.Ed. 1838 (1947). . The Government argues that the instruction as given ’’implicitly includes the concept of an appreciable time lapse.” No reason is advanced why the judge might properly have refused the'requested instruction.…
• Ryan v. United States, 191 F.2d 779 (D.C. Cir. 1951)
  …did not relate to the case on trial. The presumption, however, is rebuttable. Mattox v. United States, supra, 146 U.S. at page 150, 13 S.Ct. 50. See, also, Higgins v. United States, 1946, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 371, 160 F. 2d 222, certiorari denied, 1947, 331 U.S. 822, 67 S.Ct. 1304, 91 L.Ed. 1839; United States v. Compagna, 2 Cir., 1944, 146 F. 2d 524, certiorari denied, 1945, 324 U.S. 867, 65 S.Ct. 912, 89 L.Ed. 1422, rehearing denied, 1945, 325 U.S. 892, 65 S.Ct. 1084, 89 L.Ed. 2004. The trial court adopted t…