BRADFORD

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Smith v. United States, 337 U.S. 137 (U.S. 1949)
  …., as amended, 56 Stat. 767, 58 Stat. 632, 59 Stat. 306,60 Stat. 664. A footnote to the opinion of the Court of Appeals, 169 F. 2d 856 at 859, states: “These terms are explained in United States v. Bradford, 2 Cir., 160 F. 2d 729, certiorari denied 331 U. S. 829, 67. S. Ct. 1351, A- preference rating is applied by the original recipient to obtain commodities from a supplier who then extends (uses) the rating to secure the needed commodities from' subsuppliers.” . See Shapiro v. United States, supra, p. 6;…
• United States v. Daisart Sportswear, Inc., 169 F.2d 856 (2d Cir. 1948)
  …firm as to the balance as found by the jury. This will reduce the total amount of the fines levied upon Smith, but will not affect his prison sentence. These terms are explained in United States v. Bradford, 2 Cir., 160 F. 2d 729, certiorari denied 331 U.S. 829, 67 S.Ct. 1351. A preference rating is apfied by the original recipient to obtain commodities from a supplier who then extends (uses) the rating to secure the needed commodities from subsuppliers. “Question: I assume that anything you tell us, Mr.…
• Colonial Airlines, Inc. v. Janas, 202 F.2d 914 (2d Cir. 1953)
  …B. v. E. C. Atkins & Co., 331 U.S. 398, 406 n. 2, 67 S.Ct. 1265, 91 L.Ed. 1563; Tucker v. State of Texas, 326 U.S. 517, 519 n. 1, 66 S.Ct. 274, 90 L.Ed. 274; United States v. Bradford, 2 Cir., 160 F. 2d 729, 731, and cases cited, certiorari denied 331 U.S. 829, 67 S.Ct. 1351, 91 L.Ed. 1844. The district court did receive and rely upon facts reported to it by the CAB as amicus curiae, as the court states in its fmal memorandum of decision, although what they were does not here .appear of record. It is ob…