RACKLEY
v.
UNITED STATES
RACKLEY
UNITED STATES
331 U.S. 832
Supreme Court of the United States (1947)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Twin City Fire Ins. Co. v. Philadelphia Life Ins. Co., 795 F.2d 1417 (9th Cir. 1986)…also Taylor-Edwards Warehouse & Transfer Co. v. Burlington Northern, Inc., 715 F. 2d 1330, 1336 (9th Cir.1983) (citing the common law rule stated in Kiyoichi Fujikawa v. Sunrise Soda Water Works Co., 158 F. 2d 490, 493 (9th Cir.1946), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 832, 67 S.Ct. 1511, 91 L.Ed. 1846 (1947) that extreme hardship is not sufficient to excuse non-performance on the ground of impossibility, but noting a trend in “[m]ore modern cases” to allow the defense where performance would be extremely costly or on…
-
Aratani v. Kennedy, 317 F.2d 161 (D.C. Cir. 1963)…ternational Silk Guild v. Rogers, supra note 10. . Brownell v. Bank of America Nat. Trust & Sav. Ass’n, 94 U.S.App.D.C. 206, 214 F. 2d 855, cert. denied, 348 U.S. 864, 75 S.Ct. 89, 99 L.Ed. 681 (1954). . 158 F. 2d 490 (9 Cir., 1946), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 832, 67 S.Ct. 1511, 91 L.Ed. 1846, rehearing denied, 332 U.S. 785, 68 S.Ct. 31, 92 L.Ed. 368 (1947). The action did not arise under the Trading with the Enemy Act, and the Attorney General did not join in the petition for certiorari. . Here interest ha…