SMITH

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• Lennie Lee Joyner v. City OF Lakeland, 90 So. 2d 118 (Fla. 1956)
  …e little doubt in the mind of the officer to whom the warrant was delivered for execution that the place to be searched was within the city of Lakeland. The warrant should be read as a whole, Lowrey v. U. S., 8 Cir., 161 F. 2d 30, certiorari denied, 331 U.S. 849, 67 S.Ct. 1737, 91 L.Ed. 1858. In Bonner v. State, Fla., 80 So. 2d 683, 684, we stated in part: “ ‘Any designation or description known to the locality that points out the place to the exclusion of all others, and on inquiry leads the officers unerr…
• United States v. Issod, 508 F.2d 990 (7th Cir. 1974)
  …ndment’s requirement of an affidavit “particularly describing the place to be searched, and the person . . . to be seized” until those persons arrived to pick up the boxes. See Lowrey v. United States, 161 F. 2d 30, 33 (8th Cir. 1947), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 849, 67 S.Ct. 1737, 91 L.Ed. 1858 (1947). Furthermore, the agents were not “obliged to intercept incipient criminality before the participation of others therein [could] be ascertained.” United States v. Pryba, 502 F. 2d 391, 400 (D.C.Cir. 1974), cert.…
• Marston v. Am. Emp'rs Ins. Co., 439 F.2d 1035 (1st Cir. 1971)
  …umentary support for the insured’s interpretation which a reasonable person, unacquainted with the niceties of insurance, might similarly interpret. Gaunt v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co., 160 F. 2d 599, 601-602 (2d Cir.) (Hand, J.), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 849, 67 S.Ct. 1736, 91 L. Ed. 1858 (1947); cf. Lachs v. Fidelity & Cas. Co., 306 N.Y. 357, 118 N.E. 2d 555 (1954); Keeton, supra at 966-74. Although it is arguable that an expert might adopt American’s interpretation and find this contract unambiguous,…