GAVALIS

v.

ILLINOIS

Citator

Cited By

• Tomoya Kawakita v. United States, 190 F.2d 506 (9th Cir. 1951)
• Gen. Elec. Co. v. Porter, 208 F.2d 805 (9th Cir. 1953)
  …a monthly wage under a two-platoon system does not violate the Act. Overnight Motor Transportation Co., Inc., v. Missel, 1942, 316 U.S. 572, 62 S.Ct. 1216, 86 L.Ed. 1682; Bowers v. Remington Rand, Inc., 7 Cir., 1946, 159 F. 2d 114, certiorari denied 331 U.S. 864, 67 S.Ct. 1198, 91 L.Ed. 1869; Shepler v. Crucible Fuel Co., 3 Cir., 1944, 140 F. 2d 371. It is true that the new plan under consideration here does not come within the exception created by § 7(e) of the Act and, hence, § 7(a) was violated when the…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Van Dyke v. Bluefield Gas Co., 210 F.2d 620 (4th Cir. 1954)
  …the rule that sleeping time is not compensable. Bell v. Porter, D.C., 66 F.Supp. 49, reversed 7 Cir., 159 F. 2d 117, certiorari granted 330 U.S. 817, 67 S.Ct. 1082, 91 L.Ed. 1269, vacated 330 U.S. 813, 67 S.Ct. 1092, 91 L.Ed. 1267, rehearing denied 331 U.S. 864, 67 S.Ct. 1198, 91 L.Ed. 1869. Other Federal Courts have likewise held that adequate sleeping time is not compensa-ble under the Act. Bowers v. Remington Rand, Inc., 7 Cir., 159 F. 2d 114; Rokey v. Day & Zimmermann, Inc., 8 Cir., 157 F. 2d 734. The…