HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Scarborough v. Atl. Coast Line R. Co., 178 F.2d 253 (4th Cir. 1949)
  …edy is a limitation of the right.” (Italics ours.) See, also, 53 C.J.S., Limitations of Actions, § 1, p. 904; Osbourne v. United States, 2 Cir., 164 F. 2d 767, 768; Damiano v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 3 Cir., 161 F. 2d 534, 535, certiorari denied 332 U.S. 762, 68 S.Ct. 65, 92 L.Ed. 348; United States v. McCord, 233 U.S. 157, 34 S.Ct. 550, 58 L.Ed. 893; Winfree v. North [*256] ern Pacific Railway Co., 227 U.S. 296, 33 S.Ct. 273, 57 L.Ed. 518; Pollard v. Bailey, 20 Wall. 520, 22 L.Ed. 376; American Railroa…
• Saverio D. Iovino and Leonard P. Luisi v. Waterson, 274 F.2d 41 (2d Cir. 1959)
  …, 253 F. 2d 957, which the Supreme Court reversed, the Third Circuit had held that the three-year period of 45 U.S.C.A. § 56 could not be tolled even by fraud or concealment. Damiano v. Pennsylvania R., 3 Cir., 161 F. 2d 534, certiorari denied 1947, 332 U.S. 762, 68 S.Ct. 65, 92 L.Ed. 348. The Fourth Circuit had held the contrary. Scarborough v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., [*51] 4 Cir., 1949, 378 F. 2d 253, 115 A.L.R.2d 491, certiorari denied 1950, 339 U.S. 919, 70 S.Ct. 621, 94 L.Ed. 1343. . Appellees’ br…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. E. A. Labs., Inc., 188 F.2d 885 (2d Cir. 1951)
  …ll rights to reinstatement and back pay. As to the broad question involved we are disposed to follow the decision of the Sixth Circuit in Hamilton v. N. L. R. B., 160 F. 2d 465, 471, cert. den., sub. nom. Kalamazoo Stationery Co. v. N. L. R. B., 332 U.S. 762, 68 S.Ct. 65, 92 L.Ed. 348, thát a violation of the W. L. D. A. does not constitute a forfeiture of rights under the N. L. R. A. and that the order directing reinstatement and preferential hiring was therefore proper. However, if the Hamilton cas…