PEARCE

v.

PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Case v. Morrisette, 475 F.2d 1300 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
  ….2d 268 (1961); District of Columbia v. Seven-Up of Washington, Inc., 93 U.S.App.D.C. 272, 275, 214 F. 2d 197, 200, cert. denied, 347 U.S. 989, 74 S.Ct. 851, 98 L.Ed. 1123 (1954); Caron Corp. v. Ollendorf, 160 F. 2d 444, 445 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 765, 68 S.Ct. 72, 92 L.Ed. 350 (1947); Automotive Devices Co. v. Automotive Devices Co. of Pennsylvania, 292 F. 2d 663, 664 & n. 3 (3d Cir. 1961); Hicks v. United States, 368 F. 2d 626, 630-632 (4th Cir. 1966). . See nóte 16, supra. . See text infra a…
• Fawvor v. Texaco, Inc., 546 F.2d 636 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …nvenience justify his third-party action, a similar argument is present when a plaintiff sues a diverse and a non-diverse defendant, and such argument has been rejected. See Pearce v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 162 F. 2d 524 (3rd Cir. 1947), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 765, 68 S.Ct. 71, 92 L.Ed. 350. Not only does the rationale behind the diversity jurisdiction statute (28 U.S.C. § 1332) require its strict construction, see Thomson v. Gaskill, 315 U.S. 442, 62 S.Ct. 673, 86 L.Ed. 951 (1942); McCoy v. Siler, 205 F. 2d…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Christobal Rosario v. Am. Export-Isbrandtsen Lines, 531 F.2d 1227 (3d Cir. 1976)
  …third-party defendant under rule 14(a), Patton v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R., 197 F. 2d 732, 743-45 (3d Cir. 1952); Gladden v. Stockard S.S. Co., 184 F. 2d 510, 512 (3d Cir. 1950); Pearce v. Pennsylvania R.R., 162 F. 2d 524, 528 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 765, 68 S.Ct. 71, 92 L.Ed. 350 (1947),17 and since appellee failed to meet the jurisdictional prerequisites to suit under the Federal Tort Claims Act by filing an administrative claim as required by section 2675(a), his cause of action against the gover…