PICKING ET AL.

v.

PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Beard v. Stephens, 372 F.2d 685 (5th Cir. 1967)
  …a plaintiff pleads pro se in a suit for the protection of civil rights the court should endeavor to construe the plaintiff’s pleadings without regard for technicalities.” Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 151 F. 2d 240 (3rd Cir., 1945), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 776, 68 S.Ct. 38, 92 L.Ed. 361 (1947). Claim (3), against the sheriff and Major Cameron and Windle, acting as deputies, is clearly governed by Tit. 7, § 21. An action against a sheriff for a wrongful wounding by. his deputies during an arrest constitut…
• Agnew v. City OF Compton, 239 F.2d 226 (9th Cir. 1956)
  …, 342 U.S. 818, 72 S.Ct. 32, 96 L.Ed. 618, rehearing denied, 342 U.S. 879, 72 S.Ct. 163, 96 L. Ed. 661. . In the widely-cited case of Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 3 Cir., 151 F. 2d 240, rehearing denied, 3 Cir., 152 F. 2d 753, certiorari denied, 332 U.S. 776, 68 S.Ct. 38, 92 L.Ed. 361, rehearing denied, 332 U.S. 821, 68 S.Ct. 143, 92 L.Ed. 397, the cause of action pertaining to false arrest was based upon diversity of citizenship and not asserted violations of the Civil Rights Act. See 151 F. 2d at page…
• McSHANE v. Moldovan, 172 F.2d 1016 (6th Cir. 1949)
  …Here, Title 8 U.S.C.A. § 43, is before us for “construction; but it is to be construed as in pari materia with Title 18 U.S.C.A. § 52, making such conduct a -criminal offense. Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 3 Cir., 151 F. 2d 240, certiorari denied 332 U.S. 776, 68 S. Ct. 38. What was said and decided in the Screws case is, therefore, of importance in the present case, as it is the latest expression of the Supreme Court with respect to the conduct of state officers in depriving persons -of due process of…

  ← 1 / 2 →