KEMP
v.
ILLINOIS
KEMP
ILLINOIS
332 U.S. 778
Supreme Court of the United States (1947)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Franklin Music Co. v. Am. Broad. Cos., Inc., 616 F.2d 528 (3d Cir. 1979)…ith Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a) (clearly erroneous test for trial court findings of fact). . E. g., Landau v. Western Pa. Nat’l Bank, 445 Pa. 217, 224, 282 A. 2d 335, 339 (1971); Fife v. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 356 Pa. 265, 52 A. 2d 24, 27, cert. denied, 332 U.S. 778, 68 S.Ct. 42, 92 L.Ed. 362 (1947); Ballantine v. Cummings, 220 Pa. 621, 630, 70 A. 546, 549 (1908). . The trial judge, in relevant part, charged the jury: Plaintiff contends there was a plan or an agreement among the defendants to issue publicity,…1 / 4
-
Canada v. Jones, 170 F.2d 606 (8th Cir. 1948)…ellant had previously sought habeas corpus from the federal courts but his right to have a writ issued at that time was denied on the ground that he had not then exhausted his state remedies. Canada v. Jones, 8 Cir., 160 F. 2d 811, certiorari denied 332 U.S. 778, 68 S.Ct. 43, 92 L.Ed. -. He thereafter made separate applications to the state courts for a writ of habeas corpus and a writ of error coram nobis, but in each instance‘his petition was dismissed by the trial court on its face. The Nebraska Supreme…