ITEM COMPANY, INC.
v.
MULINA ET AL.
ITEM COMPANY, INC.
MULINA ET AL.
332 U.S. 828
Supreme Court of the United States (1947)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The appeal is dismissed for want of - a substantial federal question.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. McCULLOUGH, 202 F.2d 269 (5th Cir. 1953)…mporarily blocked. Car & General Insurance Corporation v. Cheshire, 5 Cir., 159 F. 2d 985, 987; New Amsterdam Casualty Company v. Ledoux, 5 Cir., 159 F. 2d 905; Car & General Insurance Corporation v. Thibaut, 5 Cir., 161 F. 2d 657, certiorari denied 332 U.S. 828, 68 S.Ct. 205, 92 L.Ed. 403; Allen v. Texas & Pacific Ry. Co., 5 Cir., 195 F. 2d 545, 547; Piland v. Maryland Casualty Company, D.C., 85 F.Supp. 31, 33; Penton v. Fisher, La.App., 155 So. 35; Goodwin v. Theriot, La.App., 165 So. 342; Gates v. Ark. &…