MANUFACTURERS TRUST CO., TRUSTEE,

v.

REALTY ASSOCIATES SECURITIES CORP. ET AL.; MEREDITH ET AL. V. REALTY ASSOCIATES SECURITIES CORP. ET AL.; AND VANNECK REALTY CORP. V. REALTY ASSOCIATES SECURITIES CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. The United States, 351 F.2d 956 (Ct. Cl. 1965)
  …f his essential burden of establishing the fundamental facts of liability, causation, and resultant injury. River Construction Corp. v. United States, supra; Addison Miller, Inc. v. United States, 70 F.Supp. 893, 108 Ct.Cl. 513 (1947), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 836, 68 S.Ct. 217, 92 L.Ed. 408 (1947); J. D. Hedin Construction Co., Inc. v. United [*969] States, supra, 347 F. 2d at pp. 246-247. It was plaintiffs’ obligation in the case at bar to prove with reasonable certainty the extent of unreasonable delay whi…
• Adams v. The United States, 358 F.2d 986 (Ct. Cl. 1966)
  …e rule is that “uncertainty as to the amount of the damage does not preclude recovery where the fact of damage is clearly established.” See Addison Miller, Inc., et al. v. United States, 70 F.Supp. 893, 900, 108 Ct.Cl. 513, 557 (1947), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 836, 68 S.Ct. 217, 92 L.Ed. 408 (and other cases cited in that case). It is deemed to be established by the proof that one-third of the verified loss of $128,856.12 is traceable to the arbitrary, erroneous and unwarranted rejection of tent pins by Inspe…
• Ruskin v. Reorganization, 269 F.2d 827 (2d Cir. 1959)
  …ther than to the debtor” 329 U.S. at page 164, 67 S.Ct. at page 240. and refers only to that discussion. See In re Realty Associates Securities Corporation, 2 Cir., 1947, 163 F. 2d 387, 392 (dissenting opinion of Clark, J.), certiorari denied 1947, 332 U.S. 836, 68 S.Ct. 218, 219, 92 L.Ed. 409. Of the many cases cited to us only two seem worthy of attention. In re Schafer’s Bakeries, D.C.E.D.Mich.1957, 155 F.Supp. 902, relied upon by the district court, might be persuasive authority for the decision below…