EDWARD G. BUDD MANUFACTURING CO.

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

Citator

Cited By

• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Edward G. Budd MFG. Co., 169 F.2d 571 (6th Cir. 1948)
  …to a limited extent and remanded this case to the Circuit Court of Appeals for consideration of the effect of the Labor Management Relations Act on the question to which the grant of certiorari was limited. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co. v. N. L. R. B., 332 U.S. 840, 68 S.Ct. 262. The case is now before us on this remand. In view of the questions raised by the parties, it becomes necessary to consider the wording of the Board’s order and also the wording of the Supreme Court’s Per Curiam and order of remand.…
• E. Coal Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 176 F.2d 131 (4th Cir. 1949)
  …ed on prior unfair labor practices unless the conduct involved continued to be an unfair labor practice under the amending statute.” And we think that the question has been decided by the Supreme Court in the case of Budd Mfg. Co. v. N. L. R. B., 332 U.S. 840, 68 S.Ct. 262, 92 L.Ed. 412, wherein it limited the writ of certiorari to the cease and desist provisions of an order relating to supervisory employees and refused to interfere with the order in so far as it directed reinstatement with back pay of a…
• Walker v. Felmont OIL Corp., 240 F.2d 912 (6th Cir. 1957)
  …o do so in a matter involving a difficult question under Kentucky law, and to have the benefit of a ruling by the District Judge, this case should be returned to the District Court for that purpose. Edward G. Budd Manufacturing Co. v. N. L. R. B., 332 U.S. 840, 68 S.Ct. 262, 92 L.Ed. 412; Mitchell v. United States, 348 U.S. 905, 75 S.Ct. 311, 99 L.Ed. 710. There is another question in this case which was not raised by the parties, but which is so closely connected with the question of jurisdiction that i…